Army small business office pulls the plug on LinkedIn posts

Gettyimages.com/ INA FASSBENDER / Contributor
The office directs followers to its website, but critics say the move cuts off a key connection to the defense industrial base.
In an era when government leaders routinely use social media to make significant policy announcements, the decision by the Army Office of Small Business Programs to pull the plug on its LinkedIn feed seems counterintuitive.
The LinkedIn page for the office has 25,000 followers and the office has used it to make a wide range of announcements.
The page contains small business questions about CMMC, links to register for events and promotions of programs such as the mentor-protégé portal. All of that is just in the last two weeks.
But in a post Wednesday, the office said that it will no longer actively update its LinkedIn social media account.
“Moving forward, all announcements, resources, and opportunities will be posted exclusively on our official website,” the organization wrote.
Instead, the office directs small businesses to visit its website for the latest news and information.
Commenters expressed dismay.
“This doesn’t make sense as LinkedIn is the social connectivity for the [Defense Industrial Base. ALL the other [Department of Defense] offices have pages to follow and stay connected,” wrote one person.
To prove that point, directly below his comment, the Army Pathway for Innovation and Technology posted an invitation to follow their LinkedIn page for the latest news and updates on their programs.
The Army PIT manages Small Business Innovation Research grants, among other programs to get leading edge technologies into the hands of operators.
Other comments lamented the Army’s decision.
“How unfortunate for the American small business community,” wrote one.
“This is a big loss. This page brings a lot of awareness and information to the [small business] community,” another commenter said.
One commenter was very succinct in his comment, which likely reflects the thoughts of many. “Why?”
Why, indeed.