After a series of bid protests two small businesses were added to a $461 million Army contract for program management services that was originally competed in March 2014.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory has won a sole source $25.3 million contract to support the Controlled Technical Services Program for the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division.
Abacus Technology Corp. has won a $25.7 million sole source contract to provide the Air Force with command, control, communications and computer services.
System High Corp. has been awarded a $21 million option to support the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Security and Intelligence Directorate (SID) Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) Support program.
IBM Corp. has been given another year to complete the transition of Veteran Affairs employees to a new human resources system because of agency challenges and defects.
Engineering Research and Consulting Inc. has won a $44.1 million contract to provide the Army with missile and sensor test support for the Redstone Test Center.
Guident Inc., a Salient CRGT subsidiary, has won a $9 million contract to support the Transportation Department Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).
General Dynamics United Kingdom has won a nearly $200 million contract from the UK Ministry of Defence to provide enhanced Bowman tactical communications systems to the British Armed Forces.
CSRA has won a $54 million recompete contract to create, apply and distribute complex environmental simulations in support of research initiatives conducted by EPA’s Office of Research and Development.
Sierra Nevada Corp. has won a contract extension and been awarded an option totaling $29.5 million to continue support of Navy explosive ordnance disposal personnel.
With a series of bid protests out of the way, the VA has moved ahead and made 21 awards under its $22.3 billion T4NG contract. Who made the cut, and who missed it?
CACI International has won a $199 million task order to provide operations and maintenance in support of the Agriculture Department’s Web-Based Supply Chain Management (WBSCM) system.
The long running battle between CACI International and the company now known as CSRA Inc. for a $100 million contract has quickly come to an end with CSRA withdrawing their protest.
GAO's reasoning in denying SAIC's bid protest over a $1.8 billion contract is technically correct, but it points to a boarder flaw in the system. Why does price really matter?
