Kudu has given Leidos a cyber boost and an AI surprise

“You could work forever trying to duplicate these capabilities and not get there. That was the reason we went down the acquisition path," Jason O'Connor, president of Leidos Intelligence, said of the value of the Kudu Dynamics acquisition.

“You could work forever trying to duplicate these capabilities and not get there. That was the reason we went down the acquisition path," Jason O'Connor, president of Leidos Intelligence, said of the value of the Kudu Dynamics acquisition. Leidos photo.

Find opportunities — and win them.

Leidos has already booked $260 million in new Cyber Command work, but the company's intelligence leader says the acquisition's benefits extend beyond just that.

Most acquisitions have a familiar pattern that begins with a press release touting the promise of the move, but then we hear little to nothing more.

But Leidos sees its 2025 acquisition of Kudu as going the other way.

The Kudu name keeps getting attached to contract awards less than two years after Leidos closed its $300 million purchase of the cyber company.

In October there were a pair of wins: a $160 million operations support contract with Cyber Command, and a separate $99 million other transaction authority contract with CYBERCOM to continue developing a cyber mission planning platform that Kudu brought over from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

That amounts to nearly $260 million in new business for Leidos over the next handful of years.

The new business is with customers that Leidos was not really working with before, said Jason O’Connor, president of the Leidos Intelligence sector.

“We are incredibly happy with our acquisition," O’Connor told Washington Technology.

When Leidos announced the acquisition in May 2025, CEO Tom Bell said it accelerated Leidos’ move into offensive cyber by 18 months as opposed to if the company had tried to build those capabilities on its own.

“I think that 18-month estimate was conservative,” he said. “You could work forever trying to duplicate these capabilities and not get there. That was the reason we went down the acquisition path.”

Kudu brought about 170 employees to Leidos and much of its legacy work was focused on the research end of the market. Pursuing and winning contracts exceeding $100 million was “certainly a really nice outcome,” O’Connor said.

“I won’t say it is faster than we hoped for, but it certainly did come fast," O'Connor said.

Leidos is seeing its pipeline expand because of Kudu, in no small part because of the artificial intelligence approach Kudu has brought along with its cyber offerings.

“Cyber and AI are so completely interwoven at this point that bringing in a cyber property accelerated our AI capabilities in ways that I don’t think we could have foreseen,” O’Connor said. “It just turned out that Kudu was really good at using AI to build solutions in cyber.”

The clearest example is Parcata, an AI-driven tool that finds and patches software vulnerabilities. Leidos introduced it in August. It grew out of Kudu’s work on DARPA’s AI Cyber Challenge.

Scanners that list code flaws are everywhere, O’Connor said. What sets Parcata apart is that it ranks the risks it finds, so teams can work through fixes efficiently and catch issues before code ships.

O'Connor said Leidos is running Parcata against its own software ahead of a commercial release, with more cyber and analytics products coming in the weeks and months ahead.

During a Nov. 5 earnings call with Wall Street, Leidos CEO Tom Bell spoke about Parcata as an example of the company’s push into a cyber product business that it hopes to launch later this year.

O’Connor also described what he called a “halo effect” that has come with Kudu. For example, Kudu’s offensive cyber background lets Leidos look at the systems it builds for customers the way an attacker would.

That shows up in bids well outside of pure cyber work. O'Connor said this has increased Leidos’ probability of winning on other types of contracts such as engineering, software development and analytics.

Leidos recognized it was getting something special with Kudu and was also aware of risk of destroying that uniqueness when a company with 47,000 employees acquires a firm with 170 people.

Protecting Kudu’s culture was a priority even before Leidos made its offer and still is, he said.

The integration of Kudu also is not a one-way street. Its engineers and developers are being placed on some of Leidos’ traditional contracts to coach, mentor and push new ideas.

“Not only don’t we want to erode the Kudu culture, we want to learn from it,” O’Connor said. “We want to drive a little bit of disruptive behavior, a little bit of enhanced innovation throughout the larger enterprise.”

Kudu’s arrival also lines up with a shift in how the intelligence community and the military want to buy ready-now solutions.

O’Connor said the push toward fixed-price, outcome-based contracts is the largest driver. The second is how fast technology is changing.

“What we can’t do anymore is just go in and talk to a customer and say, ‘Hey, what do you need? We’ll get back to you in a year,’” O’Connor said. “It’s got to be ready to go.”

Kudu sits inside the cyber business of Leidos Intelligence, one of five sectors the company formed in a Jan. 1 realignment.

The sector’s work is split among intelligence analysis, software development and mission cyber. O’Connor described mission as the specialized offensive and defensive work, not enterprise IT security.

“Frankly, we’re just getting started,” he said, hinting at potential wins involving weapon system and communications cyber.